Fitness equipment maker Nautilus Inc. conceded defeat Monday in its proxy battle with New York-based Sherborne Investors LP.
The Vancouver, Wash., company (NYSE: NLS) said in a joint statement with Sherborne that the investment firm had succeeded in replacing four of seven board members at a special shareholder meeting Dec. 18.
Nautilus had urged shareholders to reject the Sherborne bid for control of the company.
Sherborne partner Edward Bramson was elected chairman of Nautilus, replacing Robert Falcone. Falcone will stay on as president and CEO, according to the statement.
credited by: bizjournals.com
2007-12-07
Business Hall of Fame announces five honorees
Five business leaders were named Thursday to be inducted into the Colorado Business Hall of Fame in February.
The Hall of Fame is a joint project of the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce and Junior Achievement-Rocky Mountain Inc.
The inductees are:
Samuel Addoms, who retired in 2002 as CEO of Frontier Airlines and who previously worked with more than 15 early-stage companies.
Louis "Lou" Clinton Jr., a pilot who became the first dealer for Cessna aircraft. He also was key in establishing what's now Centennial Airport.
Harry Frampton III, a real estate developer, served as president of Vail Associates in the early 1980s. He is now developing properties in Vail and Beaver Creek and in California and Utah.
J.K. Mullen, who died in 1929, operated the largest flour mill in the state. During an economic panic in 1893, Mullen pushed the state toward agriculture as its economic base instead of mining.
William Vollbracht, who moved to Colorado in 1960, started Land Title Company of Colorado seven years later. Today the business is one of the largest privately owned title companies in the United States.
The induction ceremony will be from 6-9 p.m. Feb. 7 at the Denver Marriott City Center in downtown Denver.
credited by: bizjournals.com
The Hall of Fame is a joint project of the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce and Junior Achievement-Rocky Mountain Inc.
The inductees are:
Samuel Addoms, who retired in 2002 as CEO of Frontier Airlines and who previously worked with more than 15 early-stage companies.
Louis "Lou" Clinton Jr., a pilot who became the first dealer for Cessna aircraft. He also was key in establishing what's now Centennial Airport.
Harry Frampton III, a real estate developer, served as president of Vail Associates in the early 1980s. He is now developing properties in Vail and Beaver Creek and in California and Utah.
J.K. Mullen, who died in 1929, operated the largest flour mill in the state. During an economic panic in 1893, Mullen pushed the state toward agriculture as its economic base instead of mining.
William Vollbracht, who moved to Colorado in 1960, started Land Title Company of Colorado seven years later. Today the business is one of the largest privately owned title companies in the United States.
The induction ceremony will be from 6-9 p.m. Feb. 7 at the Denver Marriott City Center in downtown Denver.
credited by: bizjournals.com
First Financial moving HQ to Norwood
First Financial Bancorp will move its base from Hamilton to the Cornerstone at Norwood building near Rookwood Commons.
The bank already has several people at the location, which it opened in early 2006 as the base for its Cincinnati operations. The Hamilton bank hadn't made a significant push into Cincinnati and Hamilton County until then.
"This will allow us to get our core group together at one headquarters," CEO Claude Davis said. "People are spread out now."
First Financial (NASDAQ: FFBC) has most of its top executives at its Hamilton base, but others are in a Union Centre office in West Chester and at the Rookwood site.
The Rookwood location, located in Norwood near its border with Cincinnati, has fewer than 50 people now, but it will house 75 First Financial employees once the headquarters move is completed. That's expected by the end of the first quarter of 2008.
The move won't necessarily be permanent. The 25,000 square feet First Financial is leasing at Cornerstone can house up to 80 to 85 people. So as First Financial grows, it will need additional space. It will keep evaluating whether to eventually expand further at Cornerstone or relocate again, Davis said. That decision will likely be reached in the next two to three years.
The move also fits with First Financial's focus in recent years on growing in metropolitan areas. It's now aiming to grow in metro areas such as Cincinnati, Dayton, Northern Kentucky and the Indiana suburbs near Chicago.
Still, Davis said, First Financial isn't bailing out on Hamilton. Its bank subsidiary, First Financial Bank, will stay based in Hamilton. And the bank is renovating its Hamilton facility.
"Butler County is still our largest market," Davis said.
credited by: bizjournals.com
The bank already has several people at the location, which it opened in early 2006 as the base for its Cincinnati operations. The Hamilton bank hadn't made a significant push into Cincinnati and Hamilton County until then.
"This will allow us to get our core group together at one headquarters," CEO Claude Davis said. "People are spread out now."
First Financial (NASDAQ: FFBC) has most of its top executives at its Hamilton base, but others are in a Union Centre office in West Chester and at the Rookwood site.
The Rookwood location, located in Norwood near its border with Cincinnati, has fewer than 50 people now, but it will house 75 First Financial employees once the headquarters move is completed. That's expected by the end of the first quarter of 2008.
The move won't necessarily be permanent. The 25,000 square feet First Financial is leasing at Cornerstone can house up to 80 to 85 people. So as First Financial grows, it will need additional space. It will keep evaluating whether to eventually expand further at Cornerstone or relocate again, Davis said. That decision will likely be reached in the next two to three years.
The move also fits with First Financial's focus in recent years on growing in metropolitan areas. It's now aiming to grow in metro areas such as Cincinnati, Dayton, Northern Kentucky and the Indiana suburbs near Chicago.
Still, Davis said, First Financial isn't bailing out on Hamilton. Its bank subsidiary, First Financial Bank, will stay based in Hamilton. And the bank is renovating its Hamilton facility.
"Butler County is still our largest market," Davis said.
credited by: bizjournals.com
2007-12-04
T.J. Rodgers' Startup Strategy
T.J. Rodgers knows people often don't like what he has to say. The outspoken chief executive of Cypress Semiconductor (CY) has made enemies calling Social Security "a terrible scam" and describing government business subsidies as "corporate welfare." And he didn't win many friends by publicly arguing with a Catholic nun against diversifying Cypress' board with female and minority directors.
When he wants something, Rodgers doesn't stop talking until he gets it. In 2001 he wanted Cypress to invest in solar energy, though few people, least of all his board of directors, understood why.
At the time, the semiconductor industry was reeling from the collapse of the dot-com bubble. Rodgers, the man dubbed "The Bad Boy of Silicon Valley" in a 1991 BusinessWeek cover story, was presiding over red ink and layoffs. Yet he was demanding the board spend cash to buy a grad-school buddy's struggling solar energy company. "We were getting our ass kicked," recalls Rodgers. "And, oh, by the way, I want to invest in solar energy."
Fighting for Solar Power
Even if Cypress hadn't been losing money, the board's reticence would have been understandable. After all, Cypress was a semiconductor company. What did its employees know about alternative energy? More important, what did Rodgers know about it? In some respects, the solar energy business is exactly the sort he loathes: It is heavily subsidized by government funds, both in the U.S. and abroad, and it is a darling of the Green Party.
As a libertarian from Wisconsin, Rodgers' green leanings were in a very different direction: the Green Bay Packers and alma mater Dartmouth, "The Big Green." And he felt certain that solar technology developed by friend Richard Swanson's SunPower could make Cypress more green. But when Rodgers says "green," he's not referring to the environment; he's thinking of the currency made from smashing trees into pulp.
"If somebody says, 'I'll give you $100 dollars for the change in your left pocket,' you don't need to do a calculation," says Rodgers, who gave $750,000 of his own money to keep SunPower afloat while he was trying to convince the Cypress board to buy it. After 15 months of arguing, Rodgers had convinced the board of directors to invest $9 million in the struggling company, which makes solar panels that produce more power than rival products.
A few months later, Cypress bought majority control of SunPower and invested in additional plants and equipment for the business, bringing its total investment to $168 million. In November, 2005, SunPower (SPWR) held an initial public offering of stock at $18 per share. These days it trades at nearly $125, for a market value of $10.4 billion. Cypress owns more than 53% of the shares, a stake worth $5.54 billion -- more than Cypress' own market capitalization of $5.3 billion, suggesting some investors consider SunPower's shares overvalued.
Demand for Alternative Energy Is on the Rise
SunPower is a major reason Rodgers' 25-year-old company, largely a niche player in the mature semiconductor industry, ranks fourth in BusinessWeek.com's ranking of the top 75 high-growth tech companies [BusinessWeek.com, 12/3/07]. SunPower accounted for about half of the $450 million in total revenue Cypress pulled in during the third quarter of 2007.
SunPower's success is driven by soaring demand for alternative energy, with tensions in the Middle East boosting oil prices and raising doubts about reliable crude supplies. The U.S. market for solar power, which totaled about $500 million in 2005, is expected to reach $1.3 billion by 2010, according to Jennifer Mapes, an industry analyst at Freedonia, an Ohio-based research firm. The solar energy market is so hot even Google (GOOG) may want in. On Nov. 28 the king of Web search and advertising announced the creation of a research group dedicated to developing cheaper alternative energy sources such as solar and wind power. Google says it may spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the project.
Also on Nov. 28, SunPower announced a deal that may help the U.S. market expand even faster: SunPower secured $190 million in financing from Morgan Stanley (MS) to install solar panels on corporate and public buildings and then sell the resulting electricity to the building owners. The initiative's aim is to accelerate adoption of solar power by enabling building owners to purchase solar energy without an up-front investment in equipment.
Subsidies' Benefits Disputed
Such investments are a far cry from the forces that have driven the solar industry since its inception. The main source of funding has been government subsidies to partially or entirely offset the cost of solar panels in hopes of reducing pollution and easing the strain on local power grids. "The availability of [private] funds makes a big difference," says Mapes. But, she adds, "a lot of it [still] comes from government incentives."
How does that funding model square with Rodgers' vehement dislike of government subsidies? Although subsidies would appear to benefit Cypress, he argues they've hurt the solar industry. Without subsidies, he says, solar companies would have been forced to develop cheaper equipment sooner. But so long as the government is doling out subsidies, Rodgers won't hurt his company or shareholders by refusing them. "Certainly the subsidies have made it viable earlier," says Rodgers. "At the same time, I wish neither my company nor any other had them."
His determination to reduce expenses for the design, production, and installation of solar panels is evident on SunPower's Web site, where the company confidently promises to compete with retail electric rates by 2012, a move that would require it to reduce equipment costs by 50%.
New Markets Get the VC Treatment
But Cypress' successes include more than a winning solar bet. Rodgers' risk-taking spirit has produced other lucrative opportunities. "Love him or hate him, he is a very dynamic individual," says Chris Crotty, a former Cypress employee who is now a market analyst at research firm iSuppli.
Rodgers lauds Silicon Valley's venture capital model as the best entrepreneurial system in the world, and Cypress' approach to new markets is based on that model: Rather than create a new internal division, Cypress funds an existing startup or a brand-new company with outside staff. Each such venture has its own board of directors, which always includes Rodgers. Once a company is generating $10 million in quarterly sales, with profit margins of 25%, Cypress decides whether to keep it as a subsidiary or "turn it loose" by selling it or taking it public, says Rodgers.
Since founding Cypress, Rodgers has funded SunPower and six other startups with varying success. He prefers to run just one at a time. "They are crying babies," explains Rodgers, adding that startups often don't have the organizational systems in place to manage seemingly simple matters such as hiring and compensation changes. "You've got to get up every night at 3 in the morning." Of its six other startups, Cypress has sold one, microprocessor maker Ross Technology, to Toshiba for $23 million in 1993.
Reliable Chips and Ventures
The startup strategy has yielded another big win: Cypress' PSoC [for Programmable System-on-Chip], which Apple (AAPL) used in designing the iPod click wheel. The PSoC translates analog data, such as finger touches on the wheel, into commands a device can respond to, as in "turn up the volume."
Cypress recently shipped its 250 millionth PSoC. The PSoC unit has grown from a $16 million business in 2003 to $96 million in 2006. New PSoC designs have started to win Cypress contracts with other devicemakers, including Hewlett-Packard (HP), Lenovo, Nintendo (NTDOY), and Pentax.
Rodgers' latest venture is Cypress Systems, which he recruited Honeywell International (HON) executive Harry Sim to head in 2006. The company, which builds custom computer systems that rely on Cypress chips, is generating sales already. Without Cypress' infrastructure, Sim estimates it would have taken twice as long to bring in revenue. "It's the best of many, if not all, worlds," says Sim. "When you are a little startup, you struggle just to get your payroll and office set up. You have no brand. When you try to get loans, creditors won't sell to you. Now that we are part of Cypress, we are up and running right away."
With the PSoC and SunPower successes under his belt, Rodgers finds himself facing a different problem than he had in 2001, when he was trying to persuade the Cypress board to invest in SunPower. Today, Cypress' board of directors wants Rodgers to find, and fund, more startups. "I get the question, 'What's next?'" says Rodgers. The board wants to know "what the next miracle is."
credited by: BusinessWeek
When he wants something, Rodgers doesn't stop talking until he gets it. In 2001 he wanted Cypress to invest in solar energy, though few people, least of all his board of directors, understood why.
At the time, the semiconductor industry was reeling from the collapse of the dot-com bubble. Rodgers, the man dubbed "The Bad Boy of Silicon Valley" in a 1991 BusinessWeek cover story, was presiding over red ink and layoffs. Yet he was demanding the board spend cash to buy a grad-school buddy's struggling solar energy company. "We were getting our ass kicked," recalls Rodgers. "And, oh, by the way, I want to invest in solar energy."
Fighting for Solar Power
Even if Cypress hadn't been losing money, the board's reticence would have been understandable. After all, Cypress was a semiconductor company. What did its employees know about alternative energy? More important, what did Rodgers know about it? In some respects, the solar energy business is exactly the sort he loathes: It is heavily subsidized by government funds, both in the U.S. and abroad, and it is a darling of the Green Party.
As a libertarian from Wisconsin, Rodgers' green leanings were in a very different direction: the Green Bay Packers and alma mater Dartmouth, "The Big Green." And he felt certain that solar technology developed by friend Richard Swanson's SunPower could make Cypress more green. But when Rodgers says "green," he's not referring to the environment; he's thinking of the currency made from smashing trees into pulp.
"If somebody says, 'I'll give you $100 dollars for the change in your left pocket,' you don't need to do a calculation," says Rodgers, who gave $750,000 of his own money to keep SunPower afloat while he was trying to convince the Cypress board to buy it. After 15 months of arguing, Rodgers had convinced the board of directors to invest $9 million in the struggling company, which makes solar panels that produce more power than rival products.
A few months later, Cypress bought majority control of SunPower and invested in additional plants and equipment for the business, bringing its total investment to $168 million. In November, 2005, SunPower (SPWR) held an initial public offering of stock at $18 per share. These days it trades at nearly $125, for a market value of $10.4 billion. Cypress owns more than 53% of the shares, a stake worth $5.54 billion -- more than Cypress' own market capitalization of $5.3 billion, suggesting some investors consider SunPower's shares overvalued.
Demand for Alternative Energy Is on the Rise
SunPower is a major reason Rodgers' 25-year-old company, largely a niche player in the mature semiconductor industry, ranks fourth in BusinessWeek.com's ranking of the top 75 high-growth tech companies [BusinessWeek.com, 12/3/07]. SunPower accounted for about half of the $450 million in total revenue Cypress pulled in during the third quarter of 2007.
SunPower's success is driven by soaring demand for alternative energy, with tensions in the Middle East boosting oil prices and raising doubts about reliable crude supplies. The U.S. market for solar power, which totaled about $500 million in 2005, is expected to reach $1.3 billion by 2010, according to Jennifer Mapes, an industry analyst at Freedonia, an Ohio-based research firm. The solar energy market is so hot even Google (GOOG) may want in. On Nov. 28 the king of Web search and advertising announced the creation of a research group dedicated to developing cheaper alternative energy sources such as solar and wind power. Google says it may spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the project.
Also on Nov. 28, SunPower announced a deal that may help the U.S. market expand even faster: SunPower secured $190 million in financing from Morgan Stanley (MS) to install solar panels on corporate and public buildings and then sell the resulting electricity to the building owners. The initiative's aim is to accelerate adoption of solar power by enabling building owners to purchase solar energy without an up-front investment in equipment.
Subsidies' Benefits Disputed
Such investments are a far cry from the forces that have driven the solar industry since its inception. The main source of funding has been government subsidies to partially or entirely offset the cost of solar panels in hopes of reducing pollution and easing the strain on local power grids. "The availability of [private] funds makes a big difference," says Mapes. But, she adds, "a lot of it [still] comes from government incentives."
How does that funding model square with Rodgers' vehement dislike of government subsidies? Although subsidies would appear to benefit Cypress, he argues they've hurt the solar industry. Without subsidies, he says, solar companies would have been forced to develop cheaper equipment sooner. But so long as the government is doling out subsidies, Rodgers won't hurt his company or shareholders by refusing them. "Certainly the subsidies have made it viable earlier," says Rodgers. "At the same time, I wish neither my company nor any other had them."
His determination to reduce expenses for the design, production, and installation of solar panels is evident on SunPower's Web site, where the company confidently promises to compete with retail electric rates by 2012, a move that would require it to reduce equipment costs by 50%.
New Markets Get the VC Treatment
But Cypress' successes include more than a winning solar bet. Rodgers' risk-taking spirit has produced other lucrative opportunities. "Love him or hate him, he is a very dynamic individual," says Chris Crotty, a former Cypress employee who is now a market analyst at research firm iSuppli.
Rodgers lauds Silicon Valley's venture capital model as the best entrepreneurial system in the world, and Cypress' approach to new markets is based on that model: Rather than create a new internal division, Cypress funds an existing startup or a brand-new company with outside staff. Each such venture has its own board of directors, which always includes Rodgers. Once a company is generating $10 million in quarterly sales, with profit margins of 25%, Cypress decides whether to keep it as a subsidiary or "turn it loose" by selling it or taking it public, says Rodgers.
Since founding Cypress, Rodgers has funded SunPower and six other startups with varying success. He prefers to run just one at a time. "They are crying babies," explains Rodgers, adding that startups often don't have the organizational systems in place to manage seemingly simple matters such as hiring and compensation changes. "You've got to get up every night at 3 in the morning." Of its six other startups, Cypress has sold one, microprocessor maker Ross Technology, to Toshiba for $23 million in 1993.
Reliable Chips and Ventures
The startup strategy has yielded another big win: Cypress' PSoC [for Programmable System-on-Chip], which Apple (AAPL) used in designing the iPod click wheel. The PSoC translates analog data, such as finger touches on the wheel, into commands a device can respond to, as in "turn up the volume."
Cypress recently shipped its 250 millionth PSoC. The PSoC unit has grown from a $16 million business in 2003 to $96 million in 2006. New PSoC designs have started to win Cypress contracts with other devicemakers, including Hewlett-Packard (HP), Lenovo, Nintendo (NTDOY), and Pentax.
Rodgers' latest venture is Cypress Systems, which he recruited Honeywell International (HON) executive Harry Sim to head in 2006. The company, which builds custom computer systems that rely on Cypress chips, is generating sales already. Without Cypress' infrastructure, Sim estimates it would have taken twice as long to bring in revenue. "It's the best of many, if not all, worlds," says Sim. "When you are a little startup, you struggle just to get your payroll and office set up. You have no brand. When you try to get loans, creditors won't sell to you. Now that we are part of Cypress, we are up and running right away."
With the PSoC and SunPower successes under his belt, Rodgers finds himself facing a different problem than he had in 2001, when he was trying to persuade the Cypress board to invest in SunPower. Today, Cypress' board of directors wants Rodgers to find, and fund, more startups. "I get the question, 'What's next?'" says Rodgers. The board wants to know "what the next miracle is."
credited by: BusinessWeek
2007-12-03
PSC report lays out electric industry re-regulation options
A report released by the Maryland Public Service Commission late Monday calls for re-regulation of the state's electric industry, a move that could cost the state and ratepayers more in the future.
The study of the impacts of possible re-regulation, put together by Kay Scholer LLP, Levitan & Associates Inc., and Semcas Consulting Associates, was requested by state legislators during the 2007 regular session earlier this year.
Maryland deregulated its electric industry in 1999 in the hopes it would generate competition within the market and lower energy costs. But instead ratepayers have continued to see rising costs; rates by Baltimore Gas and Electric customers jumped 50 percent this summer.
The study presented five potential re-regulation options:
1. A full return to a regulated industry.
The state would have direct control over power production. The state could also construct new power generation sources to meet Maryland's needs. Constructing new generation plants could cost the state $18 to $24 billion. While this would help protect ratepayers from future market swings, it would also increase the immediate costs and risks to the state and the consumer, the report says.
2. The state could require utility companies to enter long-term contracts with new generation developers and use incentives to lower costs.
This move could help diversify Maryland's power sources, add low cost resources and stabilize and moderate retail prices for an extended period. The option could also help improve competition and lower wholesale market prices, according to the report.
3. The state could create an independent power authority to manage the state's energy programs.
4. The state could beef up the resource planning role it previously played under regulation.
This move would allow the state to direct new construction of power sources and form a unified plan.
5. The state could get more involved with the federal electricity market by constructing new power plants that could impact market prices.
In the report consultants said no one method would ease the state's rising energy costs. While ratepayers may not see immediate relief, they could see long-term benefits.
The study also looked at similar deregulation and re-regulation actions in Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey and Illinois.
In a second report released by the Maryland Public Service Commission Monday, consultants also recommended the construction of a new nuclear reactor at BGE's Calvert Cliffs plant in Southern Maryland.
credited by: bizjournals.com
The study of the impacts of possible re-regulation, put together by Kay Scholer LLP, Levitan & Associates Inc., and Semcas Consulting Associates, was requested by state legislators during the 2007 regular session earlier this year.
Maryland deregulated its electric industry in 1999 in the hopes it would generate competition within the market and lower energy costs. But instead ratepayers have continued to see rising costs; rates by Baltimore Gas and Electric customers jumped 50 percent this summer.
The study presented five potential re-regulation options:
1. A full return to a regulated industry.
The state would have direct control over power production. The state could also construct new power generation sources to meet Maryland's needs. Constructing new generation plants could cost the state $18 to $24 billion. While this would help protect ratepayers from future market swings, it would also increase the immediate costs and risks to the state and the consumer, the report says.
2. The state could require utility companies to enter long-term contracts with new generation developers and use incentives to lower costs.
This move could help diversify Maryland's power sources, add low cost resources and stabilize and moderate retail prices for an extended period. The option could also help improve competition and lower wholesale market prices, according to the report.
3. The state could create an independent power authority to manage the state's energy programs.
4. The state could beef up the resource planning role it previously played under regulation.
This move would allow the state to direct new construction of power sources and form a unified plan.
5. The state could get more involved with the federal electricity market by constructing new power plants that could impact market prices.
In the report consultants said no one method would ease the state's rising energy costs. While ratepayers may not see immediate relief, they could see long-term benefits.
The study also looked at similar deregulation and re-regulation actions in Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey and Illinois.
In a second report released by the Maryland Public Service Commission Monday, consultants also recommended the construction of a new nuclear reactor at BGE's Calvert Cliffs plant in Southern Maryland.
credited by: bizjournals.com
2007-12-02
UFCW, Safeway talk nonstop as contract deadline nears
With the current contract scheduled to expire at midnight Dec. 1, negotiations are continuing around the clock between Safeway Inc., the Pleasanton-based supermarket giant, and the United Food & Commercial Workers union.
Negotiators said some progress has been made in the contract talks, but there still remains a wide disparity on "economics" issues.
Safeway (NYSE: SWY) employs about 25,000 workers represented by four UFCW locals throughout Northern California.
If no agreement is reached, UFCW members may begin voting as early as this weekend to authorize a strike against Safeway. If workers vote to do so, a walkout against Safeway could begin shortly after the vote is tallied.
Negotiators could also decide to extend the current three-year contract so talks can continue.
The strike threat would involve only Safeway, since UFCW negotiators have already reached agreement on a new four-year contract with Raley's Inc., the West Sacramento-based company that operates Raley's and Nob Hill Foods supermarkets in the Bay Area; and Save Mart Supermarkets of Modesto, which operates Lucky and Save Mart stores throughout the region.
"Both parties are bargaining in earnest and are working hard to achieve an agreement before the contract expires," Ron Lind, president of UFCW Local 5, said in a statement also issued by his fellow UFCW local presidents throughout the region.
UFCW Local 5 represents unionized supermarket employees in Alameda, Contra Costa, Solano and Santa Clara counties, along with several neighboring counties in the Bay Area and Monterey Bay region.
credited by: bizjournals.com
Negotiators said some progress has been made in the contract talks, but there still remains a wide disparity on "economics" issues.
Safeway (NYSE: SWY) employs about 25,000 workers represented by four UFCW locals throughout Northern California.
If no agreement is reached, UFCW members may begin voting as early as this weekend to authorize a strike against Safeway. If workers vote to do so, a walkout against Safeway could begin shortly after the vote is tallied.
Negotiators could also decide to extend the current three-year contract so talks can continue.
The strike threat would involve only Safeway, since UFCW negotiators have already reached agreement on a new four-year contract with Raley's Inc., the West Sacramento-based company that operates Raley's and Nob Hill Foods supermarkets in the Bay Area; and Save Mart Supermarkets of Modesto, which operates Lucky and Save Mart stores throughout the region.
"Both parties are bargaining in earnest and are working hard to achieve an agreement before the contract expires," Ron Lind, president of UFCW Local 5, said in a statement also issued by his fellow UFCW local presidents throughout the region.
UFCW Local 5 represents unionized supermarket employees in Alameda, Contra Costa, Solano and Santa Clara counties, along with several neighboring counties in the Bay Area and Monterey Bay region.
credited by: bizjournals.com
CNA issues new 10-day strike notice to Sutter hospitals
The California Nurses Association has delivered a 10-day strike notice to Sutter Health hospitals in Northern California for a strike that could take place Dec. 13 and 14, reprising an earlier two-day walkout in October.
Strike notices were sent Friday to some of the biggest hospitals in the region, including California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, Alta Bates Summit Medical Center in Berkeley and Oakland, and Burlingame's Peninsula Medical Center, the CNA/National Nurses Organizing Committee said Nov. 30.
Since an earlier two-day strike in October, contract talks have been held at most of the hospitals, but while some progress has been made "a wide gap remains on the central areas in dispute," the union said. Talks are scheduled at CPMC on Monday, but no additional negotiations are on tap at other Sutter hospitals in the region, and two hospitals -- Sutter Delta in Antioch and Sutter Solano in Vallejo -- "have refused to hold any additional negotiations," according to CNA.
Earlier in the week, the Oakland-based union announced that RNs at 11 Sutter Health hospitals in the Bay Area would vote this week on whether to authorize a two-day strike against Sutter "over serious issues of patient safety, safe staffing, nurse health security, medical benefits, pension improvements, and the continued operation of much-needed community hospitals."
Kevin McCormack, a CPMC spokesman, said the hospital has been expecting a second strike. "We're not surprised," he told the San Francisco Business Times. "We've been planning for this strike since the last one."
McCormack said the CNA has shown little interest in holding negotiations over the last six months or so, and hasn't made any proposals involving patient safety or keeping endangered hospitals open, preferring to posture in the news media. "They've shown no inclination to sit down and talk to us and no inclination to reach a negotiated settlement," he said. "They haven't made one economic proposal in over six months. This shows they're not interested in debate."
Approximately 5,000 Sutter nurses at 13 hospitals walked off their jobs in October, in a strike that CNA described as the largest job action by nurses nationwide in a decade.
Nurses are protesting what they call "medical redlining" by Sutter, which has plans to shut down St. Luke's Hospital in San Francisco and its Sutter Santa Rosa facilities as acute-care centers, and possibly to close San Leandro Hospital as well. Compliance with nurse-staffing ratios, "meal-and-break relief" and health benefit and pension issues are also on the table, according to the union.
CNA, like Sutter Health bete noire SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, insists that other health-care systems and hospitals in Northern California, notably Kaiser Permanente, offers better retirement medical benefits than Sutter's hospitals do.
Sutter hospitals affected by the strike vote are St. Luke's and CPMC in San Francisco, San Leandro Hospital, Alta Bates-Summit, Peninsula, Castro Valley's Eden Medical Center, San Leandro Hospital, Sutter Delta, Sutter Solano, Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa, Greenbrae's Marin General Hospital and Novato Community Hospital.
"Their behavior continues to be abhorrent," CNA spokesman Chuck Idelson said.
credted by: bizjournals.com
Strike notices were sent Friday to some of the biggest hospitals in the region, including California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, Alta Bates Summit Medical Center in Berkeley and Oakland, and Burlingame's Peninsula Medical Center, the CNA/National Nurses Organizing Committee said Nov. 30.
Since an earlier two-day strike in October, contract talks have been held at most of the hospitals, but while some progress has been made "a wide gap remains on the central areas in dispute," the union said. Talks are scheduled at CPMC on Monday, but no additional negotiations are on tap at other Sutter hospitals in the region, and two hospitals -- Sutter Delta in Antioch and Sutter Solano in Vallejo -- "have refused to hold any additional negotiations," according to CNA.
Earlier in the week, the Oakland-based union announced that RNs at 11 Sutter Health hospitals in the Bay Area would vote this week on whether to authorize a two-day strike against Sutter "over serious issues of patient safety, safe staffing, nurse health security, medical benefits, pension improvements, and the continued operation of much-needed community hospitals."
Kevin McCormack, a CPMC spokesman, said the hospital has been expecting a second strike. "We're not surprised," he told the San Francisco Business Times. "We've been planning for this strike since the last one."
McCormack said the CNA has shown little interest in holding negotiations over the last six months or so, and hasn't made any proposals involving patient safety or keeping endangered hospitals open, preferring to posture in the news media. "They've shown no inclination to sit down and talk to us and no inclination to reach a negotiated settlement," he said. "They haven't made one economic proposal in over six months. This shows they're not interested in debate."
Approximately 5,000 Sutter nurses at 13 hospitals walked off their jobs in October, in a strike that CNA described as the largest job action by nurses nationwide in a decade.
Nurses are protesting what they call "medical redlining" by Sutter, which has plans to shut down St. Luke's Hospital in San Francisco and its Sutter Santa Rosa facilities as acute-care centers, and possibly to close San Leandro Hospital as well. Compliance with nurse-staffing ratios, "meal-and-break relief" and health benefit and pension issues are also on the table, according to the union.
CNA, like Sutter Health bete noire SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, insists that other health-care systems and hospitals in Northern California, notably Kaiser Permanente, offers better retirement medical benefits than Sutter's hospitals do.
Sutter hospitals affected by the strike vote are St. Luke's and CPMC in San Francisco, San Leandro Hospital, Alta Bates-Summit, Peninsula, Castro Valley's Eden Medical Center, San Leandro Hospital, Sutter Delta, Sutter Solano, Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa, Greenbrae's Marin General Hospital and Novato Community Hospital.
"Their behavior continues to be abhorrent," CNA spokesman Chuck Idelson said.
credted by: bizjournals.com
Kaiser Permanente hands out $1.3 million in HIV-AIDS grants
Kaiser Permanente is providing more than $1.3 million in grants to promote HIV-AIDS awareness, prevention, screening, support and treatment statewide -- including $100,000 to four nonprofit agencies in the East Bay -- local officials said Friday.
The announcement was timed to coincide with an international focus on the issue Dec. 1, World AIDS Day. Local grants of $25,000 each will go to:
Allen Temple Baptist Church's AIDS Ministry program in Oakland, which provides prevention education to teens and others.
California Prevention and Education Project, an Oakland-based program, providing HIV testing and screening to the city's high-risk African-American population.
The East Bay Community Law Center in Berkeley for its HIV-AIDS Immigration Law Project, counseling people with HIV-AIDS who encounter legal problems.
Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo for a program that provides food and acupuncture to people with HIV-AIDS in Richmond.
"While HIV-AIDS is present throughout all the communities Kaiser Permanente serves, the disease looks different from one community to the next and affects people in very different ways," Michael Allerton, HIV operations and policy leader for Kaiser's Northern California region, said in a prepared statement. "These grants ensure we help target underserved populations with an emphasis on culturally competent care."
credited by: bizjournals.com
The announcement was timed to coincide with an international focus on the issue Dec. 1, World AIDS Day. Local grants of $25,000 each will go to:
Allen Temple Baptist Church's AIDS Ministry program in Oakland, which provides prevention education to teens and others.
California Prevention and Education Project, an Oakland-based program, providing HIV testing and screening to the city's high-risk African-American population.
The East Bay Community Law Center in Berkeley for its HIV-AIDS Immigration Law Project, counseling people with HIV-AIDS who encounter legal problems.
Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo for a program that provides food and acupuncture to people with HIV-AIDS in Richmond.
"While HIV-AIDS is present throughout all the communities Kaiser Permanente serves, the disease looks different from one community to the next and affects people in very different ways," Michael Allerton, HIV operations and policy leader for Kaiser's Northern California region, said in a prepared statement. "These grants ensure we help target underserved populations with an emphasis on culturally competent care."
credited by: bizjournals.com
UFCW, Safeway talk nonstop as contract deadline nears
With the current contract scheduled to expire at midnight Dec. 1, negotiations are continuing around the clock between Safeway Inc., the Pleasanton-based supermarket giant, and the United Food & Commercial Workers union.
Negotiators said some progress has been made in the contract talks, but there still remains a wide disparity on "economics" issues.
Safeway (NYSE: SWY) employs about 25,000 workers represented by four UFCW locals throughout Northern California.
If no agreement is reached, UFCW members may begin voting as early as this weekend to authorize a strike against Safeway. If workers vote to do so, a walkout against Safeway could begin shortly after the vote is tallied.
Negotiators could also decide to extend the current three-year contract so talks can continue.
The strike threat would involve only Safeway, since UFCW negotiators have already reached agreement on a new four-year contract with Raley's Inc., the West Sacramento-based company that operates Raley's and Nob Hill Foods supermarkets in the Bay Area; and Save Mart Supermarkets of Modesto, which operates Lucky and Save Mart stores throughout the region.
"Both parties are bargaining in earnest and are working hard to achieve an agreement before the contract expires," Ron Lind, president of UFCW Local 5, said in a statement also issued by his fellow UFCW local presidents throughout the region.
UFCW Local 5 represents unionized supermarket employees in Alameda, Contra Costa, Solano and Santa Clara counties, along with several neighboring counties in the Bay Area and Monterey Bay region.
credited by: bizjournals.com
Negotiators said some progress has been made in the contract talks, but there still remains a wide disparity on "economics" issues.
Safeway (NYSE: SWY) employs about 25,000 workers represented by four UFCW locals throughout Northern California.
If no agreement is reached, UFCW members may begin voting as early as this weekend to authorize a strike against Safeway. If workers vote to do so, a walkout against Safeway could begin shortly after the vote is tallied.
Negotiators could also decide to extend the current three-year contract so talks can continue.
The strike threat would involve only Safeway, since UFCW negotiators have already reached agreement on a new four-year contract with Raley's Inc., the West Sacramento-based company that operates Raley's and Nob Hill Foods supermarkets in the Bay Area; and Save Mart Supermarkets of Modesto, which operates Lucky and Save Mart stores throughout the region.
"Both parties are bargaining in earnest and are working hard to achieve an agreement before the contract expires," Ron Lind, president of UFCW Local 5, said in a statement also issued by his fellow UFCW local presidents throughout the region.
UFCW Local 5 represents unionized supermarket employees in Alameda, Contra Costa, Solano and Santa Clara counties, along with several neighboring counties in the Bay Area and Monterey Bay region.
credited by: bizjournals.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
